Tuesday, 12 September 2017
quote [ “There is no substantive-due-process right to stimulate one’s genitals,” his legal team argued. ]
No word on whether one has a right to cry into a cold can of Campbell's soup while wearing a butt plug.
|
ScoobySnacks said @ 6:42am GMT on 12th Sep
[Score:1 Funny]
|
slaytanik said[1] @ 12:02pm GMT on 12th Sep
[Score:1 WTF]
But errrrr, did no-one see this on his twitter:
He's removed it since, but it was there for a while |
backSLIDER said @ 2:24pm GMT on 12th Sep
[Score:1 Funsightful]
NSFW *spit take* I mean I don't know what I expected.
|
HoZay said @ 7:30am GMT on 12th Sep
He seems nice.
|
cb361 said @ 10:03am GMT on 12th Sep
A face you can trust.
|
spazm said @ 7:47am GMT on 12th Sep
What a wanker.
|
mechavolt said @ 12:55pm GMT on 12th Sep
Ah yes, the "if there isn't a law that explicitly says you can do this, then you can't" argument. Typical SJW libtard cuck government overreach. Vote R next election!
|
TM said @ 1:26pm GMT on 12th Sep
Not far removed from George Orwell's chilling phrase "That which is not forbidden is compulsory."
|
cb361 said @ 2:48pm GMT on 12th Sep
[Score:2 Funny]
If you want a picture of the future, imagine Ted Cruz, oiled up and masturbating on a human face — forever.
|
5th Earth said @ 6:59pm GMT on 12th Sep
I think I'll take the jackboot, thanks
|