SE Ads -
Subscriber Ads are now live :)
quote [ The Trump administration, with the help of Republicans in Congress, have for weeks been hyping up an internal House memo as the new Pentagon Papers. That memo was finally made public on Friday ]
Representative Devin Nunes, of California, and his conservative allies had strongly implied that the memo would offer incontrovertible proof of the intelligence community’s bias against President Donald Trump in investigating Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election. In the past few days, however, Republicans have walked back that assertion, apparently after reading the memo for themselves.
On Friday, Trump declassified the memo.
|
[SFW] [politics] |
|
|
|
[by
ubie]
|
|
|
|
derek said @ 10:04pm GMT on 2nd February
Of course you can play, though you're going to have to try harder than that.
Your choice example is poor as we know Comey specifically did two things.
1. Testified before congress stating that the dossier was salacious and unverified.
2. Signed FISA applications using the same dossier as primary cause without disclosing their source, or their "salacious and unverified" nature.
(which I stated in a post above...do you disagree with either 1 or 2?)
How to you reconcile those?
derek said @ 10:05pm GMT on 2nd February
Of course you can play, though you're going to have to try harder than that.
Your choice example is poor as we know Comey specifically did two things.
1. Testified before congress stating that the dossier was salacious and unverified.
2. Signed FISA applications using the same dossier as primary cause without disclosing their source, or their "salacious and unverified" nature.
(which I stated in a post above...do you disagree with either 1 or 2?)
How do you reconcile those?
/
derek said @ 10:04pm GMT on 2nd February
Of course you can play, though you're going to have to try harder than that.
Your choice example is poor as we know Comey specifically did two things.
1. Testified before congress stating that the dossier was salacious and unverified.
2. Signed FISA applications using the same dossier as primary cause without disclosing their source, or their "salacious and unverified" nature.
(which I stated in a post above...do you disagree with either 1 or 2?)
How do you reconcile those?
Embedded copy of the memo in the linked article.