Anarcho-Syndicalism -
Theory and Practice by Rudolf Rockner
quote [ Reddit follows several other platforms that have already banned deepfakes pornography. That includes Gfycat, Discord, and recently Pornhub, which said that deepfakes imagery counted as nonconsensual pornography. ]
[NSFW] [science & technology] |
[+4 Informative] |
|
[by
7]
|
|
|
|
Taxman said @ 2:35am GMT on 8th February
Ir reeks of privilege.
Remember first and foremost that no one gave a shit about revenge porn, or if they did, they did a piss-poor job of getting it legislated away. Yes they're working on it, but it should NOT be this hard. If an ex has your bank account information, or your house keys, or your car keys, or anything else that is TRUTH about your life, but you no longer wish them to have access, AND THEY USE IT ANYWAYS, felony (in most cases, but especially anything financial).
Second, this is NOT for the benefit of regular people.
'7" if they took your face, or if they took steele's face, or my face and put it in a porn... WE would care obviously. However, NO ONE else would know/care! We're just not special and no one will know us from any other person.
This was done to protect celebrities who do not want something being made that will go viral instantly and (god forbid) become what they are known for (more than their usual accomplishments).
If they truly cared, 'fake' porn, 'involuntary' porn, whatever, would have been banned from the get-go and this new AI assisted porn would 'of course' be banned as soon as it was thought up.
Taxman said @ 3:16am GMT on 8th February
It reeks of privilege.
Remember first and foremost that no one gave a shit about revenge porn, or if they did, they did a piss-poor job of getting it legislated away. Yes they're working on it, but it should NOT be this hard. If an ex has your bank account information, or your house keys, or your car keys, or anything else that is TRUTH about your life, but you no longer wish them to have access, AND THEY USE IT ANYWAYS, felony (in most cases, but especially anything financial).
Second, this is NOT for the benefit of regular people.
'7" if they took your face, or if they took steele's face, or my face and put it in a porn... WE would care obviously. However, NO ONE else would know/care! We're just not special and no one will know us from any other person.
This was done to protect celebrities who do not want something being made that will go viral instantly and (god forbid) become what they are known for (more than their usual accomplishments).
If they truly cared, 'fake' porn, 'involuntary' porn, whatever, would have been banned from the get-go and this new AI assisted porn would 'of course' be banned as soon as it was thought up.
/
Taxman said @ 2:35am GMT on 8th February [Score:1 Underrated]
It reeks of privilege.
Remember first and foremost that no one gave a shit about revenge porn, or if they did, they did a piss-poor job of getting it legislated away. Yes they're working on it, but it should NOT be this hard. If an ex has your bank account information, or your house keys, or your car keys, or anything else that is TRUTH about your life, but you no longer wish them to have access, AND THEY USE IT ANYWAYS, felony (in most cases, but especially anything financial).
Second, this is NOT for the benefit of regular people.
'7" if they took your face, or if they took steele's face, or my face and put it in a porn... WE would care obviously. However, NO ONE else would know/care! We're just not special and no one will know us from any other person.
This was done to protect celebrities who do not want something being made that will go viral instantly and (god forbid) become what they are known for (more than their usual accomplishments).
If they truly cared, 'fake' porn, 'involuntary' porn, whatever, would have been banned from the get-go and this new AI assisted porn would 'of course' be banned as soon as it was thought up.