Pavlok 2! -
Break Bad Habits via Zaptik Feedback - More Shockinger!
|
Thursday, 8 February 2018
quote [ Reddit follows several other platforms that have already banned deepfakes pornography. That includes Gfycat, Discord, and recently Pornhub, which said that deepfakes imagery counted as nonconsensual pornography. ]
Followup to this post. This ruling applies not only to video, but also GIFs and even still images. The subreddit for photoshopping celebrities which has existed for seven years and had some 50,000+ subscribers was banned today without warning.
|
Taxman said @ 12:01pm GMT on 10th February
Trump I would assume, and this is just my postulation, understands the cost of war to the country.
This conflicts with your Thaddeus article where "Trump tells it like it is" and doesn't really understand the politics (i.e. cost) of a situation. You shouldn't be able to have it both ways. He can't be an off the cuff, says whatever he's thinking, AND total tactician that knows exactly what he's saying and its consequences.
Ask the people of Venezuela how well a Socialist government is going for them. It is a prime example of a modern implementation's failure.
In all of these examples a poor country has gone socialist as a means for survival. It seems to fail because when there's not enough to go around, the authority starts hoarding "what's left". I will admit my history (and fear) of socialism is probably not as great as yours, but has there ever been a country as rich as ours (and I mean world power level) that has tried socialism? I think a hybrid of our democratic process, mixed with our cultural beliefs on as much freedom as possible, along with the mixing pot of beliefs, races, etc. would blend well with the god parts of socialism. It's not all or nothing, we can take the parts we like and leave the rest you realize?
I do not accept the casual bigotry that goes around when talking about white people or men.
Do you/would you accept the casual bigotry that goes around when talking about any other race, gender, or culture (add-on)?
Also, when women gained the right to vote, did men lose anything, in your opinion?
Taxman said @ 12:03pm GMT on 10th February
Trump I would assume, and this is just my postulation, understands the cost of war to the country.
This conflicts with your Thaddeus article where "Trump tells it like it is" and doesn't really understand the politics (i.e. cost) of a situation. You shouldn't be able to have it both ways. He can't be an off the cuff, says whatever he's thinking, AND total tactician that knows exactly what he's saying and its consequences.
Ask the people of Venezuela how well a Socialist government is going for them. It is a prime example of a modern implementation's failure.
In all of these examples a poor country has gone socialist as a means for survival. It seems to fail because when there's not enough to go around, the authority starts hoarding "what's left". I will admit my history (and fear) of socialism is probably not as great as yours, but has there ever been a country as rich as ours (and I mean world power level) that has tried socialism? I think a hybrid of our democratic process, mixed with our cultural beliefs on as much freedom as possible, along with the mixing pot of beliefs, races, etc. would blend well with the god parts of socialism. It's not all or nothing, we can take the parts we like and leave the rest you realize?
I do not accept the casual bigotry that goes around when talking about white people or men.
Do you/would you accept the casual bigotry that goes around when talking about any other race, gender, or culture (add-on)?
Also, when women gained the right to vote, did men lose anything, in your opinion?
Taxman said @ 12:04pm GMT on 10th February
Trump I would assume, and this is just my postulation, understands the cost of war to the country.
This conflicts with your Thaddeus article where "Trump tells it like it is" and doesn't really understand the politics (i.e. cost) of a situation. You shouldn't be able to have it both ways. He can't be an off the cuff, says whatever he's thinking, AND total tactician that knows exactly what he's saying and its consequences.
Ask the people of Venezuela how well a Socialist government is going for them. It is a prime example of a modern implementation's failure.
In all of these examples a poor country has gone socialist as a means for survival. It seems to fail because when there's not enough to go around, the authority starts hoarding "what's left". I will admit my history (and fear) of socialism is probably not as great as yours, but has there ever been a country as rich as ours (and I mean world power level) that has tried socialism? I think a hybrid of our democratic process, mixed with our cultural beliefs on as much freedom as possible, along with the mixing pot of beliefs, races, etc. would blend well with the good parts of socialism. It's not all or nothing, we can take the parts we like and leave the rest you realize? It doesn't even have to be tomorrow. We can slowly move towards it to avoid the failures of the past.
I do not accept the casual bigotry that goes around when talking about white people or men.
Do you/would you accept the casual bigotry that goes around when talking about any other race, gender, or culture (add-on)?
Also, when women gained the right to vote, did men lose anything, in your opinion?
<-- Entry / Current Comment
Taxman said @ 12:01pm GMT on 10th February
Trump I would assume, and this is just my postulation, understands the cost of war to the country.
This conflicts with your Thaddeus article where "Trump tells it like it is" and doesn't really understand the politics (i.e. cost) of a situation. You shouldn't be able to have it both ways. He can't be an off the cuff, says whatever he's thinking, AND total tactician that knows exactly what he's saying and its consequences.
Ask the people of Venezuela how well a Socialist government is going for them. It is a prime example of a modern implementation's failure.
In all of these examples a poor country has gone socialist as a means for survival. It seems to fail because when there's not enough to go around, the authority starts hoarding "what's left". I will admit my history (and fear) of socialism is probably not as great as yours, but has there ever been a country as rich as ours (and I mean world power level) that has tried socialism? I think a hybrid of our democratic process, mixed with our cultural beliefs on as much freedom as possible, along with the mixing pot of beliefs, races, etc. would blend well with the good parts of socialism. It's not all or nothing, we can take the parts we like and leave the rest you realize? It doesn't even have to be tomorrow. We can slowly move towards it to avoid the failures of the past.
I do not accept the casual bigotry that goes around when talking about white people or men.
Do you/would you accept the casual bigotry that goes around when talking about any other race, gender, or culture (add-on)?
Also, when women gained the right to vote, did men lose anything, in your opinion?
