Monday, 1 March 2021
quote [ IGN counts down the 100 best video games ever made. ]
I just used the IGN article as a starting off point. The real stuff is in the extended.
To be clear, this is not a list of what I think the best games of all time are. These are the games I think people who have never played video games before should play, in order. Consider it a history lesson. Most of these games are still available legally in one form or another.
It's a bit hard to read because the formatting doesn't work.
|
![]() |
steele said @ 7:45pm GMT on 1st Mar
[Score:1 Funsightful]
|
![]() |
mechanical contrivance said @ 7:54pm GMT on 1st Mar
+1 pornsightful
|
![]() |
EvilNinjaX24 said @ 9:55pm GMT on 1st Mar
Man, I owned and/or played SO many of those games on your list, starting with Pong ('cause I'm old like that, but Pong is older than me). Nicely done.
|
![]() |
bbrack said @ 1:14am GMT on 2nd Mar
Despite not being a fan of the Fighting or Sports genre, I feel like Street Fighter 2, Mortal Kombat, NBA Jam, and NHL '94 deserve a place on a list like this as well.
With the degree that basic mechanics of platformers and old games like these have been honed in the modern day, when I want to try and get a non-gamer or someone younger in I've found it usually is an easier sale to dig deep into something that was really weird or unique, like a Toejam and Earl or Parodius. Living in the middle of nowhere I also missed out on the classic arcade games, all we ever had was bubbletop hockey or golden tee, usually next to a pinball machine of whatever the latest blockbuster was. My favorite part of travel hockey league wasn't playing hockey, but getting to go to other rinks where they had the 4-player Ninja Turtle Game or X-men game. |
![]() |
mechanical contrivance said @ 2:42am GMT on 2nd Mar
I just realized I had forgotten those. I would add them, but the time for editing seems to have passed.
|
![]() |
biblebeltdrunk said @ 6:28am GMT on 2nd Mar
hmm, making a list of top games is weird for me as I actively like systems that are not things I would recommend to someone who isn't already deeply familiar with games.
|
![]() |
mechanical contrivance said @ 3:05pm GMT on 2nd Mar
Since many of us are already familiar with games, I'm interested in your must-play list. Not necessarily what you think are the best games, but the games that you think all gamers should try at least once.
|
![]() |
biblebeltdrunk said @ 6:32pm GMT on 2nd Mar
[Score:1 Insightful]
top games everyone should try once - grandparents edition
1990 - super mario world 1993 - NBA Jam which ever rhythm game looks funnest to you - likely of Guitar Hero/Rock Band, ddr, or beat saber. this list is a lot shorter due to 3d cameras not being a thing I don't know how to introduce to older people. everyone should try once - passing familiarity. |
![]() |
mechanical contrivance said[1] @ 8:43pm GMT on 2nd Mar
After much consideration, here is my revised history of gaming curriculum.
|
![]() |
cb361 said[1] @ 9:42am GMT on 2nd Mar
I think the IGN list may be mixing up seminal games and great games.
Doom was groundbreaking, but you probably wouldn't play it today except for historical reasons. And the list admits that Halo didn't do anything radically new, but implemented what it did do incredibly well. |
![]() |
C18H27NO3 said @ 8:11pm GMT on 2nd Mar
Answer me this : The friend that gave me the games I posted in shoutbox (Antichamber, Disco Elysium, and the Talos Principle) said that if I play for an hour a day, I'll be able to complete all three in a years time. A whole year?
Is that true? I could read War and Peace, Ulysses, all of Dickens, Dostoyevsky, and Atlas shrugged and I would have time left over. We had lengthy discussions about gaming, and he likened it to reading novels and literature, but it's interactive. He said plots, story lines, etc, are the same with gaming. He has something like over 500 games, and was really enthusiastic to get me to "game." The last games I played recently were Dumb Ways to Die on my phone and before that asteroids and pac man. But that was a million years ago. |
![]() |
mechanical contrivance said @ 8:40pm GMT on 2nd Mar
[Score:1 Underrated]
Games are a journey, not a destination. The true goal isn't to finish the games; it's to enjoy yourself while playing them. Finishing a game is merely an accomplishment you can be proud of.
Not all games have endings, either. Some games go on for as long as you want to play. That works because, again, it's about having fun, not completing a task. It's recreation, not work. |
![]() |
Paracetamol said @ 8:51pm GMT on 2nd Mar
This. And a lot depends on what works for you.
|
![]() |
C18H27NO3 said @ 9:25pm GMT on 2nd Mar
So I guess goal oriented people shouldn't game? I understand it's about the journey, but if the journey is boring, then what's the point? And boring is subject to interpretation.
|
![]() |
mechanical contrivance said @ 9:47pm GMT on 2nd Mar
Everyone has their own tastes. If a particular game isn't fun for you, find a different one. Since you don't have a lot of gaming experience, it should be no surprise that you haven't figured out what kinds of games you like.
Since I don't know your tastes, I can't make any specific recommendations. My best advice is to try a bunch of different genres and see which ones appeal to you. For examples of games to try, both my list and the IGN list are good places to start. |
![]() |
C18H27NO3 said @ 10:14pm GMT on 2nd Mar
All good. I understand. It's why the guy who recommended those games did so because he got to know me a bit. But I have to say I'm more open to it than I was 10 years ago.
And I couldn't sleep last night so I opened steam and played antichamber for probably an hour instead of reading a book. That's a major step. |
![]() |
mechanical contrivance said @ 12:01am GMT on 3rd Mar
That's good. You've taken your first step into a larger world.
|
![]() |
C18H27NO3 said @ 1:48am GMT on 3rd Mar
See, that's part of the reason all this rubs me the wrong way. It's not a "larger" world, it's a different world. Gamers make it seem like it's the same as reading or any other activity. Or better. It's not.
|
![]() |
mechanical contrivance said @ 2:18am GMT on 3rd Mar
I was quoting a movie. Chill.
|
![]() |
C18H27NO3 said[1] @ 9:40pm GMT on 3rd Mar
What movie? And I'm totally chill. :)
|
![]() |
mechanical contrivance said @ 11:31pm GMT on 3rd Mar
Star Wars
|
![]() |
biblebeltdrunk said @ 6:20am GMT on 3rd Mar
I don't know if I agree with that. Major spoilers for Nier.
in a similar vein, games like The Void and and Lucha, Born of a Dream are both games meant to cause stress as part of the mechanics as you are rushing against losing time. So while the experience is still about a journey, there are games that seek to give more emotions than just having fun. |
![]() |
biblebeltdrunk said[1] @ 6:23am GMT on 3rd Mar
[Score:1 Insightful]
The average times each of those games takes for a completionist run of finishing every piece of content in the game is 8½, 41, & 28 hours, respectively. That falls to 6, 20½, & 16 hours for just going through the main story. That's from polls of gamers so I would add 5 hours for the worse case completionist time as a buffer and while that's an investment it's no where close to a year.
|
![]() |
Paracetamol said @ 9:47pm GMT on 31st May
late good opinion:
I don’t think it is, generally, essential to understand people need video games in their life, perhaps, they do not or they just would like nothing more than a casual game to while away the minutes waiting for the bus. Maybe, it is a tad utopian to think we can make a “real gamer” out of anyone, maybe we just would like someone to play co-op with; but at least we can take comfort in the knowledge that, by picking the correct approach, we have allowed that person to see and better understand the multifaceted world of videogames. via
|
![]() |
C18H27NO3 said[2] @ 1:46am GMT on 3rd Mar
.
|