Thursday, 15 May 2014

911 Memorial Museum Opens.

quote [ 911 Museum Opens To The Public Next Week. ]

$24 Admission Fee.

Who paid for its construction?

Who owns the lease?

Who operates the museum?

How much does it take to administer, operate, and maintain?

$96 Million profit based on the same visitors to the Empire State Building. 4 million visitors yearly. Likely to be more.

Is this a for profit business or is it a public museum? How does this compare to Pearl Harbor? Civil War sites?

Are they privately purchased pantings? Who owns the artifacts and news associated with the event? Is it a burial ground?

Discuss. . .
[SFW] [+3 Informative]
[by LL@11:46pmGMT]

Comments

ComposerNate said @ 8:29am GMT on 16th May [Score:1 Good]
American Foxnews-Republican Christians emulate their martyr savior through victimhood, to which this monument testifies. No price is too high to ease the dissonance of humbled privilege.
lilmookieesquire said @ 12:18am GMT on 16th May
Do the profits go towards anything? Like a charity or something? I know it's NYC but $25 seems steep. I guess rent is expensive.
robotroadkill said @ 12:46am GMT on 16th May
The "first look" gallery is interesting. Apparently noteworthy is the fact that a firetruck hasn't healed itself even after all these years.
foobar said @ 1:06am GMT on 16th May [Score:0 Underrated]
13 years on and Americans are still wetting themselves over a relatively minor incident.

Yeah, I think it's more than fair to say the terrorists won.
HoZay said @ 2:12am GMT on 16th May [Score:4 Underrated]
+1 Troll.
We would all have been much better served by brushing the attack off, relatively speaking. Should have cleaned up the site and moved on without all the exploitation.
It had to be treated as The Worst Thing Ever in order to justify a bunch of extralegal militarism and to get Republican policies enacted.
conception said @ 1:41am GMT on 16th May
The deadliest terrorist attack in modern history? Minor? Really?
conception said @ 1:52am GMT on 16th May
Addendum: I think I get your point. It certainly was exploited to give a lot of power and money to various parties by using the fear of the people. In that, certainly we lost... even if the terrorists didn't exactly win (America is certainly not out of Middle Eastern politics or life).

That said - apart from the corruption occurring in the aftermath... 9/11 is a legitimately horrible milestone in our nation's history.
GordonGuano said @ 2:12am GMT on 16th May
Given that we inflicted a 9/11's worth of civilian casualties on Iraq every day for like three years*, "minor" seems kind of appropriate. It seemed like a big deal at the time because we're fat and complacent and try to keep our foreign policy as foreign as possible. But in perspective, it was a month's worth of shootings in the good ol' USA. Done all at once in a very mediagenic manner, to be sure.


*ballpark estimate, I'm not gonna quibble numbers if anyone wants to look them up.
kylemcbitch said @ 2:41am GMT on 16th May
I will quibble over the numbers.

The highest estimate available of deaths in the Iraq War:

1,033,000 (civilian and military, both sides of the conflict)

Length of the Iraq War:

7 years~ (2003-2011*)

Total casualties of 9/11:

2,977

Number of days in a 7 year timeframe:

2,555

Number of causalities expected if what you say was even remotely true:

7,606,235
--------------------------

I am not saying that America's reaction was right, and I am certainly not saying American lives are worth more. I am saying that the loss of life in a single day far outstrips anything during the Iraq War, and is worth remembering.
kylemcbitch said @ 2:48am GMT on 16th May
Correction: You stipulated the first three years of the war.

In that case the number of expected casualties should be 3,259,815.

Still a few million higher than highest estimated total death toll.
GordonGuano said @ 4:39am GMT on 16th May
I stand corrected. That's the equivalent of a 9/11 every day for almost a year. Which I imagine would still be pretty desensitizing.
kylemcbitch said @ 5:45am GMT on 16th May
Well, yes... but still wrong.

See, I didn't change the casualty numbers to reflect just the first three years. That number is 654,965 according to most sources I could find. This puts your estimation even further into the realm of the ridiculous.
GordonGuano said @ 3:13pm GMT on 16th May
Ridiculous is my bread and butter. You're over thinking this. A million deaths (aka one statistic) divided by 2,997 deaths (one 9/11) makes 334.67 9/11s, so you could have a 9/11 almost every day for a year. It's one of those "every day enough donuts are cooked to circle the moon" analogies, with nothing to do with the length of the war or relative population size.
kylemcbitch said @ 6:08pm GMT on 16th May
Except that the length of the war wasn’t a year, no matter how many ways you want to slice it. Now, if you condensed the entire 7 year conflict to a year, then you are correct and a 9/11 worth of dead people occurred every day.

I am not sure with universe you are from, but to my understanding of it time doesn't let fold it like that, even if it would let your soundbite sound really awesome.

ComposerNate said @ 6:48pm GMT on 16th May
GordonGuano is talking overall volume, not percentage.
arrowhen said @ 9:38pm GMT on 16th May
Texting while driving kills 3,000 people a year but I don't see us launching any wars over that.
cb361 said @ 9:44pm GMT on 16th May
Who would you invade?
arrowhen said @ 10:59pm GMT on 16th May
Psh. Details.
arrowhen said @ 11:17pm GMT on 16th May [Score:1 Insightful]
Though I suppose the obvious target would be iRaq.
damnit said @ 4:26am GMT on 17th May
robotroadkill said @ 4:31am GMT on 16th May
Just to clarify, I down modded for the first sentence, not the second one. Name the country that wouldn't want to create a memorial for something like this and keep artifacts pertaining to it. It's hardly "wetting" one's self. I agree that the terrorists won -we are reminded of it every time we put up with insane security checks, every time we see how much taxpayer money gets dumped into "homeland security," and with every revelation about how the us government is spying on its own citizens. But that makes it all the more major of an incident. The damage to the US wasn't restricted to a few thousand people and a couple planes & buildings, it changed the culture here (and in the government) in a way that is worse and very difficult to change back.
foobar said @ 6:27am GMT on 16th May
That would be the "wetting themselves" to which I was referring.

Someone said something about having nothing to fear but fear itself. The best memorial would be to shrug your shoulders and move on.
steele said @ 4:37pm GMT on 16th May
I totally forgot about the 0 mods! :D
lilmookieesquire said @ 12:45am GMT on 17th May
*Thinks about making a witty joke about the bush family but remembers about the NSA and does not*
HoZay said @ 2:35am GMT on 16th May
$24/head seems a lot, but I doubt it will be enough to cover maintenance. This site will continue to be a money pit for the forseeable future. There'll be big crowds for a while, but this is designed as if it will mean as much to future generations, which it won't.
It's not nearly as significant as the Holocaust Museum, but it's presented as at least its equal.
lalanda said @ 6:18pm GMT on 16th May [Score:1 WTF]
LL said @ 9:19pm GMT on 16th May [Score:1 Informative]
I wouldn't actually put too much credence in that survey. It's the ADL. They probably asked people in poverty with no education. They probably didn't know about WW1 either. The fact that they polled people they are in conflict with certainly skews the overall results. The ADL has openly admitted that they will bend perception and go after people who might be perceived as being anti-Semitic simply to advance their cause. I'd also like to know what the same populace says about muslims, catholics, etc. You can read results the same for everybody, I'm sure.
damnit said @ 6:57pm GMT on 16th May
That's actually sad. Museums/Memorial centers can only do so much. If schools don't talk about it, you're fucked.
foobar said @ 8:03pm GMT on 16th May
To compare, if surveyed how many 55 year olds would be aware of the Armenian Genocide?
GordonGuano said @ 3:09am GMT on 17th May
Half the victims have disappeared, it's only fair.
Bruceski said @ 6:39am GMT on 16th May
Have you tried to answer your own questions, or are you more interested in manipulating people by pretending it's a mystery?
LL said @ 9:20pm GMT on 16th May
No. I'm not trying to manipulate anything, but thanks for your input.

Post a comment
[note: if you are replying to a specific comment, then click the reply link on that comment instead]

You must be logged in to comment on posts.



Posts of Import
Karma
SE v2 Closed BETA
First Post
Subscriptions and Things

Karma Rankings
ScoobySnacks
HoZay
Paracetamol
lilmookieesquire
Ankylosaur