Tuesday, 3 May 2016

How receiving a text can make you a sex offender

quote [ Deputies arrested 17-year-old Levar Allen, of Bossier City, on two separate occasions this month. He faces charges of contributing to the delinquency of a juvenile and possession of child pornography because the girl was 16 years of age, a minor. ]

Technically, does it even matter if you engage in the sexting or not? The moment the pics are on your phone, you are in possession of child porn, and the cops can bust you, right?

Full article in extended.

Reveal
BOSSIER CITY, LA (KSLA) -

A local mother claims her son is being singled out and charged excessively after admitting to sexting a fellow teenager.

But Bossier sheriff's office officials are making no apologies about why they charged both teenagers.

Deputies arrested 17-year-old Levar Allen, of Bossier City, on two separate occasions this month. He faces charges of contributing to the delinquency of a juvenile and possession of child pornography because the girl was 16 years of age, a minor.

Bossier Parish Sheriff's Office Spokesman Lt. Bill Davis said they charged the girl with sexting first. Lt. Davis said she used a phone provided to her by Allen.

Davis later added that detectives also found multiples nude images and videos on Allen's phone explaining, "Some are homemade videos that he captured on his phone of him having sex with other females, girls other than the 16-year-old, but whom we can't identify, as well as other images of nude females that we can't identity, images that he took on his phone or were provided to him."

But Allen's mother, Chasity Washington, said her son did not start the text exchange which led to the charges against him. "A little girl sent him a video, she was 16. He sent her a video and he got charged."

Sexting is the sharing of nude or sexually explicit photos or messages. Research shows teen sexting is on the rise. Recent studies show 1 in 4 teenagers admit to sexting. Some describe it as a perfect storm of technology and hormones, the legal consequences of which can be catastrophic for teenage suspects.

We found that out in Allen's case. His mother described Allen as a good kid with no criminal past and a 3-sport athlete at Parkway High School in south Bossier City.

Washington said she had warned her son about the consequences of sexting and described the nature of the texts in question as, "A video of a young lady doing an obscene act to herself. And then he sent one doing the same thing."

Washington said she feels authorities are making an example of her son and believes race is a factor. "I think because she's white, the parents got upset that she's been doing what she's been doing."

Lt. Davis bristled at the notion that race played any role in this case. "I have nothing to say about that. It doesn't matter what your race, what your religion, what your ethnicity, don't do child pornography! Plain and simple."

Davis reminded us about a news conference the Bossier sheriff's office held a little more than 2 years ago about a sexting case involving several teenagers and the public awareness campaign that followed.

"We had our detectives go to every high school and every middle school here in Bossier Parish and talked to all of the students about the consequences of not only sexting but how it can lead in to child pornography," added Davis.

Bossier-Webster District Attorney Schuyler Marvin told us he's dealt with several teen sexting cases in recent years. But Marvin said they rarely go to trial and typically end in a plea deal.

Allen's mom said her son is now out on bonds totaling $15,000 and is back at Parkway High. The single mother of 3 expects to spend $4,000 on legal expenses to help defend her son. She's scheduled to meet with an attorney Monday.
[NSFW] [Quickies] [+3 WTF]
[by Taleweaver@4:27pmGMT]

Comments

mechanical contrivance said @ 5:04pm GMT on 3rd May [Score:1 Informative]
There was an instance years ago of a law enforcement officer sending child porn to someone, then arresting them for possession of child porn. The conviction stuck.
Bleb said @ 5:11pm GMT on 3rd May
Without knowing the specifics of the case, I would imagine that there was a prior conversation about naked kids going on before any images were sent. If someone suddenly sends you unsolicited child porn and you don't immediately delete it, scrub your hard drive and tell the sender to die in a fire, you may deserve your conviction.
Taleweaver said @ 5:25pm GMT on 3rd May
Yup, that's what I suspected.
zarathustra said @ 7:31pm GMT on 3rd May
When I was in law school, one of the cases we studied on the subject of Entrapment was about a guy who the cops had been sending catalogs for illegal porn for something like 20 years and for all that time he wrote angry letters to the return address, told them to stop, etc. Later, as a now old man and after his wife died he ordered something and they arrested him. I don't recall its course through the courts, but he was released.
XregnaR said @ 5:00pm GMT on 3rd May
Louisiana...
Morris Forgot his Password said @ 5:04pm GMT on 3rd May
Given that the authorities claim he made some of the videos....
Bleb said @ 5:24pm GMT on 3rd May [Score:2]
16 year olds should probably not be making sex tapes, but there has to be an allowance made if they're both under the age of 18. Teens are gonna teen. You shouldn't be charged with a felony because you managed to get your dick wet before you ordered your first beer.
midden said @ 7:14pm GMT on 3rd May
"Teens are gonna teen."

Yup, and we've all been there. it seems ridiculous to make any kind of reasonably teen stupidity illegal. I would certainly have spent some time in jail for some of the stupid stuff I did as a teen, had we been caught, especially these days. Of course, there is still unreasonably teen, and that's another matter.
XregnaR said @ 7:19pm GMT on 3rd May
Shit, I'd probably still be in jail if we applied today's standards.

Something something...domestic terrorism...something something...3 strikes...something something...
midden said @ 7:26pm GMT on 3rd May
Oh, yes. Mostly harmless things we did for fun would probably land us in the clinker for terrorism, maybe for decades. I'm sure there must have been a local police file on us. But back in the 80's, it was probably filed under, "Some Stupid Kids are Being Stupid and Freaking Some Adults Out." Now-a-days, it would be filed under "Domestic Terrorism."

Now, as an adult, I can clearly see how stupid it was, but God, it was fun at the time!
rylex said @ 7:42pm GMT on 3rd May
Dry ice bombs+public places=fun
XregnaR said @ 7:48pm GMT on 3rd May
I was slightly more advanced than dry ice bombs. I was making my own fireworks as a teenager, and used some of the local parks (after dark of course) for testing purposes. That and you run of the mill vandalism.

I look back and the main thing I ask myself is "why the fuck was it so easy for a teen to get black powder?!?"

If I could go back in time, I think I would mainly slap myself upside the head and tell myself that my taxes will end up paying for repairing the next generation's efforts. And probably provide some alternate testing locations...
midden said @ 8:02pm GMT on 3rd May
I don't know how it is these days, but buying model rocket engines was no big deal in the 80s. We used to hack-saw them open, then crush them with a hammer between layers of newspaper.

We didn't vandalise anything, but I'm pretty sure we freaked some people out.
XregnaR said @ 9:18pm GMT on 3rd May
MY vandalism consisted mainly of "taking out" the streetlights in the local parks so I could book it in to the woods unseen should the local constabulary arrive on scene.

I did mess with the rocket engines a bit, but I had a "mentor" who was teaching me the basics of fireworks. That geezer probably didn't realize I wasn't using my newfound powers for good.
SnappyNipples said @ 5:21pm GMT on 3rd May
This is why I only carry a burner phone that doesn't have data. The replacement battery cost more than the phone, about 11 bucks, and no grief. Also, I probably only use it 3 or 5 times a month in any calls, while you are at it, GET THE HELL OFF MY LAWN.
Bleb said @ 5:25pm GMT on 3rd May
You carry a burner because you're concerned about random teenagers sending your pictures of their tits?
SnappyNipples said @ 5:41pm GMT on 3rd May [Score:3 Informative]
Barring that a teen does get a hold of my number or steam address, yes I do fear these things. I work in special education specializing in behavior disorders. Let us say poor impulse control gets these students in so much trouble very quick in life, like sexting.
rylex said @ 5:32pm GMT on 3rd May
Thats why i carry mine.
SnappyNipples said @ 7:25pm GMT on 3rd May
Mine is on my persons, password locked, and shut off.
XregnaR said @ 7:49pm GMT on 3rd May
You burn random teens with pictures of your tits?
mechanical contrivance said @ 7:59pm GMT on 3rd May
Damn, those are some hot tits.
XregnaR said @ 9:16pm GMT on 3rd May
Hot & Snappy.
SnappyNipples said @ 11:51pm GMT on 3rd May

Post a comment
[note: if you are replying to a specific comment, then click the reply link on that comment instead]

You must be logged in to comment on posts.



Posts of Import
Karma
SE v2 Closed BETA
First Post
Subscriptions and Things

Karma Rankings
ScoobySnacks
HoZay
Paracetamol
lilmookieesquire
Ankylosaur