Friday, 24 November 2023

NTSB Calls for Technology to Reduce Speeding in All New Cars

quote [ WASHINGTON (Nov. 14, 2023) – The National Transportation Safety Board investigation into a multivehicle collision in North Las Vegas, Nevada, last year that resulted in nine fatalities has led the board to recommend a requirement for intelligent speed assistance technology in all new cars ]

And cue the beginning gov overreach into control they can exert onto newer vehicles
[SFW] [Big Brother] [+1 Good]
[by rylex@10:41pmGMT]

Comments

mechanical contrivance said @ 5:23am GMT on 25th Nov [Score:3 Insightful]
It won't actually happen, so don't worry about it. Just worry about being killed by stupid drivers.
Hugh E. said @ 9:56am GMT on 25th Nov
So it's "them or me", "every man for himself", "kill or be killed"?
Sounds like a very civil and safe society.
mechanical contrivance said @ 2:43pm GMT on 25th Nov
You don't have to try to kill other drivers. In fact, you shouldn't. You just have to drive as if every other driver on the road can't see you.
Jack Blue said @ 8:24am GMT on 25th Nov
Hey. If gov. build roads you can speed on, I don't see the problem in them limiting how fast you go on said roads.

Then again, I am not really a fan of cars. In particular not in cities.
rylex said @ 2:32pm GMT on 25th Nov [Score:1 Funny]
i think the issue isn't as much the speed guidelines they post for us with expectation to follow, and moreso their attempt at removing one's free will to decide to follow this or not.

it can easily be a slippery slope wherein we give up the right for our cars to exceed posted highway speeds and the next logical step is to allow Gov to disable motors for cars that aren't paid up with registration/insurance/etc.
mechanical contrivance said @ 2:48pm GMT on 25th Nov
Free will to decide whether to obey the law? They're laws, not recommendations.

As far as a slippery slope, speeding presents a clear and present danger. Unpaid insurance or registration does not.
rylex said @ 3:24pm GMT on 25th Nov
laws which confuse morality with legality.

and it can be argued it's equally immoral/illegal/unsafe for someone to drive uninsured. even if they follow posted speed limits, in the case of not having insurance or a surety bond backing the driver, then any accident theyre involved in leaves behind damages that should be paid for by the responsible party
Jack Blue said @ 9:57pm GMT on 25th Nov
"[...]the right for our cars to exceed posted highway speeds [...]

Seems simple to me. You wanna do that, you build your own highway to exceed it on.
rylex said[1] @ 8:18am GMT on 26th Nov
thought the taxes i paid WERE building a highway i could do this on.


Just kidding, i know it isn't and this is why i choose to not pay taxes, among other reasons
Menchi said @ 12:33am GMT on 26th Nov
This is the first time I've seen theodicy applied to the government.
rylex said @ 8:21am GMT on 26th Nov
i feel like the current religious right applies it daily
mechanical contrivance said @ 2:44pm GMT on 25th Nov
A fair number of Americans think the government shouldn't build roads. They would rather private companies build the roads and charge a toll for driving on them.
rylex said @ 3:26pm GMT on 25th Nov
and this is why I don't agree with toll roads installed by the government.

so our taxes pay for a road, that we have to pay further fees to drive upon?

Post a comment
[note: if you are replying to a specific comment, then click the reply link on that comment instead]

You must be logged in to comment on posts.



Posts of Import
Karma
SE v2 Closed BETA
First Post
Subscriptions and Things

Karma Rankings
ScoobySnacks
HoZay
Paracetamol
lilmookieesquire
Ankylosaur