Monday, 26 September 2016
quote [ Their suggestion: our known universe could be the three-dimensional “wrapping” around a four-dimensional black hole’s event horizon. In this scenario, our universe burst into being when a star in a four-dimensional universe collapsed into a black hole. ]
Edited for clickbait
|
arrowhen said @ 5:49pm GMT on 26th Sep
[Score:2]
Headlines with exclamation points are always a sign of quality. Quality!
|
Bleb said @ 6:16pm GMT on 26th Sep
Came here to say this. This!
|
sanepride said @ 7:24pm GMT on 26th Sep
Science!
|
sanepride said @ 5:17pm GMT on 26th Sep
[Score:1 Interesting]
In fact it's a terrible explanation. Why not just link directly to the two-year old cited article from the Perimeter Institute instead of this shitty piece of click-bait?
|
mechavolt said @ 5:55pm GMT on 26th Sep
So it's been a hot decade since I took any physics. Why is this a terrible explanation?
|
sanepride said @ 7:23pm GMT on 26th Sep
Explained in this sentence at the bottom:
Note: Content may be edited for style and length.. Meaning reprinted with inexplicably bad grammar, sentence structure, and exclamation points. Helpful hint- compare with the original I linked to. |
mechavolt said @ 10:21pm GMT on 26th Sep
Well, I skipped the main link and read your article instead. So what you're saying is that your issue is with the presentation of the idea, and not the idea itself?
|
sanepride said @ 10:23pm GMT on 26th Sep
Yep. I didn't say the idea was terrible, I said the explanation was terrible (in response to the poster's comment, now gone since he changed the link).
|
lethalflatulence said @ 7:37pm GMT on 26th Sep
Because I am a retaed
|
cb361 said @ 5:17pm GMT on 26th Sep
It's black holes, all the way down.
|
hellboy said @ 6:46pm GMT on 26th Sep
Ironic user name.
|
JWWargo said @ 7:43pm GMT on 26th Sep
|